The recent incident where a black Harvard professor accused an officer of the Cambridge Police Department of racial profiling reminded me that the subject remains controversial, even to the extent of making national headlines. Yet racial profiling is only one example of unfair treatment. Other types of profiling are equally egregious when they have a discriminatory impact on people. It strikes me how prone we are to profiling one another.
Much attention has been given over the years to profiling in the workplace, and the resulting discrimination that may occur. However, not all profiling is bad, and in the employment process it can actually have a positive impact on those searching for work. I think it is important to define several terms to understand the disparate effect profiling may have on people.
Webster’s dictionary defines the word profile as “a set of characteristics or qualities that identify a type or category of person or thing.” In psychology, it refers to “a description of behavioral and personality traits of a person compared with accepted norms or standards.” The Encarta dictionary defines profiling as the “analysis and classification of something based on personal information such as: ethnicity, shopping habits, or behavior patterns, used e.g. in criminal investigations or product advertising.” Both words are used in an evaluation process.
Profiling in the workplace is inappropriate when bias enters the process. Encarta defines bias as”an unfair preference for or dislike of something.” The Thesaurus compares the word to “prejudice, unfairness, or foregone conclusion.” Bias is illegal and becomes workplace discrimination when it results unfair or unfavorable treatment due to race, religion, national origin, disability or veteran status, or other legally protected characteristics such as age sex, and color.
Profiling is common practice and can be controversial because it affects our everyday actions. It is evident that it can have a negative impact on those searching for work. Good interviewers can become expert at profiling, therefore applicants and candidates must be alert to such practices, and know how to effectively respond.
A proactive response for example, is to control what the interviewer initially knows about you. You do this by carefully preparing your resume, particularly how you describe yourself in a short introductory profile or summary. Choosing references wisely and knowing what they will say can work to your advantage. Astutely sharing information from personality and other types of aptitude tests can help you present the profile information you want the interviewer to know about.
How you deal with profiling is important to your job search success. Here are a few tips—
· Have a realistic understanding of your strengths and weaknesses
· Be aware of what legal discriminatory practices might affect you
· Be aware of personal characteristics that could cause bias toward you
· Be prepared to respond to attempts to profile you in a discriminatory or biased manner
· Become fluent in turning negative statements into positive action or attributes
· Be prepared to describe yourself briefly and interestingly
Much attention has been given over the years to profiling in the workplace, and the resulting discrimination that may occur. However, not all profiling is bad, and in the employment process it can actually have a positive impact on those searching for work. I think it is important to define several terms to understand the disparate effect profiling may have on people.
Webster’s dictionary defines the word profile as “a set of characteristics or qualities that identify a type or category of person or thing.” In psychology, it refers to “a description of behavioral and personality traits of a person compared with accepted norms or standards.” The Encarta dictionary defines profiling as the “analysis and classification of something based on personal information such as: ethnicity, shopping habits, or behavior patterns, used e.g. in criminal investigations or product advertising.” Both words are used in an evaluation process.
Profiling in the workplace is inappropriate when bias enters the process. Encarta defines bias as”an unfair preference for or dislike of something.” The Thesaurus compares the word to “prejudice, unfairness, or foregone conclusion.” Bias is illegal and becomes workplace discrimination when it results unfair or unfavorable treatment due to race, religion, national origin, disability or veteran status, or other legally protected characteristics such as age sex, and color.
Profiling is common practice and can be controversial because it affects our everyday actions. It is evident that it can have a negative impact on those searching for work. Good interviewers can become expert at profiling, therefore applicants and candidates must be alert to such practices, and know how to effectively respond.
A proactive response for example, is to control what the interviewer initially knows about you. You do this by carefully preparing your resume, particularly how you describe yourself in a short introductory profile or summary. Choosing references wisely and knowing what they will say can work to your advantage. Astutely sharing information from personality and other types of aptitude tests can help you present the profile information you want the interviewer to know about.
How you deal with profiling is important to your job search success. Here are a few tips—
· Have a realistic understanding of your strengths and weaknesses
· Be aware of what legal discriminatory practices might affect you
· Be aware of personal characteristics that could cause bias toward you
· Be prepared to respond to attempts to profile you in a discriminatory or biased manner
· Become fluent in turning negative statements into positive action or attributes
· Be prepared to describe yourself briefly and interestingly